Early recovery
For years, Save the Children, alongside other aid organisations, has advocated for increased investment in “early recovery” efforts in Syria, even though it has become caught up in the political conversation about “reconstruction.”
This is a type of aid that is defined as “humanitarian” and not “development,” prioritising sustainable solutions that empower communities to help themselves, and foster resilience. Like teacher training or supporting communities to repair playgrounds and schools. That is what early recovery is supposed to do.
But so much of the time, we can’t even do this. The sad reality is that Syria’s conflict is far from over. Since last October, dozens of people have been killed and at least 120,000 forcibly displaced by violence, in the most significant escalation in years.
For early recovery to work, basic infrastructure needs to be in place, giving us something to build off. It relies on an electricity grid, piped water, and functioning markets. But for more than a decade now, Syrians have endured declining basic services. Damage to power stations, coupled with fuel shortages for those still functional, have plunged entire cities and villages into prolonged blackouts. In some areas, households are lucky if they have electricity for more than 30 minutes per day.
We are watching the basic elements of a successful early recovery, and a future transition into development, collapse around us. Syrians are in economic freefall, with 90% of people struggling to buy essentials.
I am watching this, and experiencing this, as one of the 13 million Syrians who were forced or chose to leave over the last 13 years, becoming refugees or displaced people. My phone is regularly flooded with heartbreaking requests from relatives or friends-of-friends struggling back home.
Even those not caught up in the violence are being squeezed by the economic crisis, with aid workers sending photos of empty refrigerators, while parents are making the difficult choice to send children on perilous journeys across the Mediterranean Sea to make it to Europe.
Time for a change
There are moments when Syria’s unresolved political situation, and the way it impacts aid, are far too clear.
Last year, when earthquakes hit southern Türkiye and northern Syria, killing more than 56,000 people, the international community was slow to respond in Syria. During the subsequent pledging conference asking for donors to chip in, the language used reflected very distinct priorities.
For Türkiye, the emphasis was on rebuilding infrastructure, ensuring fully functional hospitals, and creating job opportunities to enable affected individuals to rebuild their lives and support their families.
In contrast, the discussion regarding Syria highlighted the fact that the earthquake had exacerbated an existing humanitarian crisis, underscoring the already urgent need for funding. There was no talk of rebuilding, or even helping people get back on their feet. There wasn’t much discussion of early recovery, either.